Skip to main content
Department of Psychiatry Department of Psychiatry

Interpersonal Phase Processes

Definition

"Processes that govern interpersonal activities, rather than the emergent states that often emanate from such experiences." (Marks et al., 2001, p. 368)

(*occurs throughout both transition and action phases)

Key References

  • Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975
    • Proposed a theoretical model of how information & communication technology use and functionality may influence the relationship between virtual team interpersonal processes and team outcomes, not experimental.

Recent Articles

  • Fisher, D. M. (2014). Distinguishing between taskwork and teamwork planning in teams: Relations with coordination and interpersonal processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034625
    • Examined the relationship between team planning and interpersonal processes. Found that the relationship between taskwork and teamwork is independent of the subsequent team processes.
  • Killumets, E., D’Innocenzo, L., Maynard, M. T., & Mathieu, J. E. (2015). A multilevel examination of the impact of Team Interpersonal Processes. Small Group Research, 46(2), 227–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415573631
    • Examined interpersonal processes as a factor in team members intentions to remain with their current organization and team-level, manager-rated effectiveness.
    • Found that interpersonal processes have a positive effect on effectiveness and quality team interpersonal processes had a significant positive impact on members' decision to remain with their current organization.
  • Müller, R., & Antoni, C. H. (2021). Effects of ICT shared mental models on team processes and outcomes. Small Group Research, 53(2), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496421997889
    • Evaluated the effect of information and communication shared mental models on team effectiveness indicators.
    • Found that manipulated information and communication technology shared mental models significantly influenced team performance, coordination effectiveness, and affective team commitment.